{"id":831,"date":"2021-03-24T14:50:59","date_gmt":"2021-03-24T21:50:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/motorcyclesok.ca\/?p=831"},"modified":"2021-03-24T14:50:59","modified_gmt":"2021-03-24T21:50:59","slug":"whats-the-deal-with-micro-mobility","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/motorcyclesok.ca\/whats-the-deal-with-micro-mobility\/","title":{"rendered":"What’s the Deal With Micro mobility?"},"content":{"rendered":"
With due respect to that Seinfeld signature opening, what is in fact is the deal with micro-mobility?<\/p>\n
It\u2019s not hard to find negative press on micro-mobility products such as spent rental e-scooters littering city streets, e-bike riders zipping among traffic or on sidewalks, or media stories highlighting the novelty of powered skateboards. Mobility advocates push and lobby for incentives to attract users. Others however, would argue it\u2019s at the expense of sensible product monitoring, licensing and operator training. There has been the expected backlash and resistance with the usual rocky relationships that dot the transportation landscape. New players tend to disturb an already stressed system.<\/p>\n
The various levels of government have moved cautiously. An early challenge is to first sift through some definitions around micro-mobility.<\/p>\n
First, start with the view of the U.S. Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) who weigh in with the idea of classifying \u201cmicro-vehicles\u201d. The SAE distinguishes six types of powered micro-vehicles:<\/p>\n
1. powered bicycles
\n2. powered standing scooters
\n3. powered seated scooters
\n4. powered self-balancing boards
\n5. powered non-self-balancing boards
\n6. powered skates<\/p>\n
Next, is how big is \u201cmicro\u201d? A vehicle \u201cweight cap\u201d is still looking for consensus. It\u2019s an important safety and liability aspect since the overall mass of a vehicle and contents can be an obvious factor determining subsequent potential to inflict personal and property damage. Here are three examples:<\/p>\n
\u2022 \u201cMobility Podcast\u201d in the US lobbies for a 500 KG (1,002 lb) limit. That\u2019s half a ton!
\n\u2022 A recent International Transportation Forum report cited a cap of 350 KG ( 771 lbs).
\n\u2022 The SAE Association in the US suggest a cap of 227 KG ( 500lbs) <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Finally, there is \u201cApplication\u201d or \u201cintended use\u201d. It\u2019s the flashpoint for many discussions and can start with the notion of what micro-mobility isn\u2019t. It\u2019s a pragmatic thought.
\nSome say these products are unsuitable for sidewalks, which are the domain of pedestrians and certain very-low-speed vehicles. They are also unsuitable for vehicle-occupied roads dominated by cars and trucks capable of highway speeds. <\/p>\n
Thus, you end up with the overarching view to say micro-mobility leverages, or is assigned to, bicycle spaces. That is something that can be controlled.<\/p>\n
Mobility advocates can glaze over the issues of public interest around safety, legal, and administrative concerns. They focus on incentive messaging similar to what is already realized by motorcycles and scooters; an option to public transit and its Covid concerns, smaller footprint, greener than cars, some personal freedom, and less wear on roadways. However, unlike micro-mobility offerings, motorcyclists need a licence, insurance and training before they jump into the larger transportation system. That\u2019s good for the public interest.<\/p>\n